Dr. Lisa Peacock, Obstetrics & Gynecology chair and director of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery at LSU Health New Orleans School of Medicine, took the pro position in a debate about whether or not obstetricians should routinely check the bladder and urethra when performing hysterectomies. The debate comprised the John I. Brewer Memorial Lecture at the 2017 Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists this month. She shared research results including the largest multi-center study looking at the question. That study found the detection rate of injury to the urethra and bladder of 6.7% and 37.5%, respectively, jumped to 97.4% overall with cystoscopy. A cystoscopy is a procedure to examine the lining of the bladder and urethra using a hollow tube with a lens called a cystoscope.
Even though support has been growing for the better safe than sorry approach, both sides stressed the need for more research and cost analysis.
'We still need more research and cost analysis,” concludes Peacock. "The cost analysis we've been working on is 16 years old. It had significant limitations that could have impacted the threshold rate and it may actually be lower. We need better prospective studies to really determine our injury rates. We need to look at how we can reduce costs. This could be an effective way to detect injury at a cost price point where it's not egregious."